Project Overview

High-quality research is more likely to flourish within an environment and culture that is fair, inclusive and supportive. Such a culture is shaped, in part, by the decisions and actions taken within research organisations.

The COMET project will improve decision-making within institutions, by promoting and facilitating evidence-informed practice, to promote research excellence.

This will be achieved by producing a body of evidence demonstrating how decisions are currently made, after undertaking a rigorous study with a sample of UK Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), and by co-designing practical outputs with stakeholders to support institutions improve their decision-making by basing those decisions on better evidence.

The project has ethics approval from the University of Bristol (22506).

Objectives

Explore and compare the use of meta-research evidence in decision-making processes within HEIs around research culture.
Understand the similarities, differences and relationships between the meso- and micro-level of evidence use and decision making in research culture within HEIs

 

Improve the use of evidence in institutional decision-making processes affecting research cultures.

 

Our Journey

The project will undertake focused interviews with individuals from six organisation across three categories of research intensity, ensuring the diversity of UK institutions is represented across the sampled institutions and reflected in the findings.

Through the interviews, the project will explore decision making at different levels within institutions: both at an institution-wide level (meso-level) and within a school or department (micro-level) to understand the similarities, differences and relationships of decision-making between the two levels. It will also explore the identify and role of change agents.

The study will examine effective practices as well as provide insight into the challenges and barriers around embedding evidence-informed practice within institutions.

Building on the findings of the research study we will co-develop outputs with stakeholders to support institutions to make better use of evidence in their decision-making, ensuring that decision is the right one for them to enhance research culture and improve research. 

May 2025 Update

So far: We’ve completed 58 interviews

We’ve been carrying out interviews with individuals across both academic and professional services. By digging into how decisions are made at different organisational levels, we’re highlighting what’s working well, and what challenges and obstacles institutions face when trying to put evidence-informed practices into action.

 

Early analyses: Universities as producers but not users of evidence

With most of our interviews now complete, our early thematic analyses indicate that meta-research evidence is not widely used by institutions making decisions about research culture, despite their role as producers of evidence. We recognise barriers on both the producer and user sides of meta-research, and will explore both as our analyses progress.

Next steps: Sharing findings and co-designing practical resources

In the coming months we’ll be writing up our findings: producing an evidence-base for the higher education sector which we’ll share far and wide. These findings will also help shape our work with stakeholders across the sector to co-design practical tools and resources. These resources will aim to make it easier for people and institutions to use high-quality evidence in their decision-making. 

October 2025 Update

After wrapping up our research interviews and a busy summer sharing our first results (at the MetaScience, IRCC, and STI-ENID conferences and the Wellcome Trust mid-way event), we’re now turning our attention to making change within higher education.

Help us make change

This next stage of our project will design and deliver a programme of activity to improve evidence-informed decision-making around research culture in universities. We seek to do so in a way that links outputs to an evidence-informed theory of change and ensures outcomes are practical, meaningful, and sustainable. Potential activities may include:

Piloting (to test one or more elements of) an internal unit within HEIs to translate and share external evidence/academic literature with decision-makers.

Convening networks to bring together institutional decision-makers with meta-researchers e.g. via an event series.

i

Developing an Evidence-Informed Research Culture Manifesto for universities, with supporting guidance.

Developing a vision for a national approach to evidence-informed decision-making around research culture, with targeted recommendations.

Come along if you...

Work anywhere in a higher education institution and want to help us co-develop these activities. We don’t ask for specific expertise but rather a strong interest and commitment to evidence-informed research culture change.

We’re seeking 10-12 individuals to form our core group, and more to collaborate and share ideas with as a wider group of individuals and stakeholders with an interest in our project.

How much time do I need to set aside?

The project will take place between November 2025 and June 2026. The core co-development group will involve up to 2.5 hours per month of online meetings and collaboration work + a one day in-person meeting in Bristol at the project mid-point.

Wider stakeholders can be involved flexibly according to their interest and availability.

Why take part?

Be part of a collaborative and inclusive approach to shaping evidence-informed decision-making around research culture change across the sector.

Receive credit for your contributions.

Travel expenses for the one-day meeting in Bristol will be reimbursed.

Get involved in change!

Join our co-development project to help strengthen evidence-informed decision-making around research culture.

 

If you are interested in being part of our co-development group, please email us a couple of sentences about why you would like to take part.

Please also let us know if you would be able to commit to being part of our core co-development group and attending the meetings outlined above, or if you would instead prefer to be part of a wider consulting group.

Outcomes

The findings of this work will be used to co-create practical outputs with stakeholders, which will support individuals and institutions to more easily draw on high-quality evidence to inform their decision-making.

Ultimately, this work will contribute toward enabling individual institutions to foster healthier, more sustainable and appropriate research environments that will attract and retain diverse talent as well as driving research excellence.

Funders

This project has been funded by the Wellcome Trust.

UKRN Project Updates

STAR & METEOR Projects Introduced at UKRN Webinar

STAR & METEOR Projects Introduced at UKRN Webinar

The STAR and METEOR projects were introduced at the most recent UKRN Webinar: Nurturing change through growing UKRN projects. Project Coordinator Rosalind Strang spoke about our plans for the projects, including why these projects are vital in the current environment...

UKRN Launches STAR and METEOR Projects

UKRN Launches STAR and METEOR Projects

The UK Reproducibility Network is pleased to announce the launch of two new projects, working towards our vision of the UK research system being outstanding in conducting and promoting rigorous and transparent research.  STAR – Sustainable & TrAnsparent Research...